On this page:

Private Finance Initiative / Public Private Partne

PRIVATE FINANCE INITIATIVE / PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS

Contents:

Scope

Key Points

Background

Selection

Project Management

Accounting

Further Advice


Scope

1. This section gives guidance on the selection, management and accounting of projects to be procured by means of Private Finance Initiative / Public Private Partnerships (PFI/PPP).


Key Points

2. PFI/PPP should only be pursued where it is likely to deliver better value for money than conventional procurement.

3. All proposed major investment projects should be considered for PFI/PPP but expert advice should be sought on a case by case basis in order to avoid the undertaking of unnecessary work on projects which from the outset would clearly be unsuitable.

4. The procedures which should be followed in a PFI/PPP procurement are very similar to those for a conventional major investment project. Applicable guidance in respect of Value for Money assessment of projects that are procured under PFI/PPP is available on the FPU website.

5. The external auditors should be consulted with regard to the accounting treatment of relevant projects prior to issue of the Invitation to Negotiate and during contract negotiations as appropriate.


Background

6. It is possible in many projects to use private sector finance and management expertise to provide services and related assets which would traditionally have been financed and operated by the public sector. The basic concept is straightforward: instead of buying a road, building or other asset and then operating it itself, the public sector enters into a long-term contract with the private sector to do so. A unitary payment is made for the services and assets provided on a regular basis over the life of the contract. Appropriate risks are transferred to the private sector where it can manage them best. This reduces public sector exposure, for example to cost overruns, provides certainty over future costs and rewards operators who manage services well. The applicable assets revert back to the public sector at the end of the contract.

7. Variants on this basic approach are financially free-standing projects (e.g. toll bridges) where the public sector enables the project to go ahead but the service charges are paid directly by those who benefit from the service, and joint ventures where some public investment is necessary to enable a project to go ahead or to secure wider benefits.

8. This approach is complementary to the contracting out of central and local government services. It is distinct from privatisation because the public sector retains all its current responsibilities e.g. the provision of clinical or educational services. It defines the service standards required and puts in place contractual arrangements to ensure they are delivered satisfactorily.

9. By opening up opportunities for private investment, it may be possible to take projects forward which by conventional means would have taken much longer, or which in some cases would not have occurred at all. Most importantly, it enables private sector financial, commercial and creative skills to be brought to bear on the management of projects while the public sector concentrates on the output it requires in terms of services and performance. To maximise the scope and incentive for the private sector to innovate and secure efficiencies, a public body must specify only the essential outputs of a project, leaving the private sector to decide how to provide them. A well managed competition will ensure that the public sector gets the best price for the service. For PPPs, value for money will be assessed in accord with VfM assessment guidance available from Scottish Executive Financial Partnerships Unit (FPU) website. A key element in demonstrating VfM in the PPP procurement process is the evidence of competition.


Selection

10. PFI/PPP should only be pursued where it is likely to deliver better value for money than conventional procurement. It is therefore necessary to make an indicative assessment at the outset on whether a project is suitable. This should include an option appraisal in accordance with the Green Book. The affordability, commercial viability and value for money potential should then be further tested during the development of an outline business case for the project, and this should be submitted to the FPU for review before the formal commencement of a competition.

11. All proposed major investment projects, in particular major capital investment projects, should be considered for PFI/PPP but expert advice should be sought on a case by case basis in order to avoid the undertaking of unnecessary work on projects which from the outset would clearly be unsuitable. This consideration should be across investment programmes. That does not mean that all projects which are subsequently examined for their suitability for PFI/PPP should be tested on the market. The public sector should go out to competition only on well thought out proposals that could offer the prospect of good PFI/PPP projects. Approval for not pursuing PFI/PPP in relation to major investment projects should be obtained at an appropriate level and reasons documented.

12. It is generally accepted that PFI/PPP is better suited to projects with an overall cost of more than £20m. Projects with prospective capital values of between £10m to £20m should be reviewed on a case by case basis. Projects should be prepared on the basis of clear output specifications and robust business cases and should be deliverable under standardised contractual structures.


Project Management

13. The procedures which should be followed in a PFI/PPP procurement are very similar to those for a conventional major investment project - see the section on Major Investment. They include project identification and definition on the basis of an option appraisal, outline business case and competitive tendering - usually under the EC procurement regulations' negotiated procedures. The differences are in the nature of the work undertaken at each stage, notably the need to focus on specification of outputs, and in the project management activity after a contract is signed. The client is likely to be less engaged in monitoring the progress of the construction of any asset concerned, but will take a close interest in overall progress towards the delivery of defined service outputs. Whereas in a conventional capital procurement the client organisation will need to put in place a team to manage an asset once it has been constructed, in a private financed scheme it will need an "intelligent customer" capability to manage the contract for the services which are provided by the project operator.


Accounting

14. The accounting treatment of PFI/PPP projects is currently assessed under the Amendment to Financial Reporting Standard 5 "Reporting the Substance of Transactions: Private Finance Initiative and Similar Contracts". Guidance to the public sector on the application of FRS 5 is given in Technical Note No 1 (revised) "How to Account for PFI Transactions". The Technical Note is mandatory for all bodies preparing their accounts in accordance with the Government Financial Reporting Manual. Copies are available from the FPU or accessible via the Unit's web page. The guidance sets out how to determine whether the assets in the project fall on or off the public sector purchaser's balance sheet. The Technical Note also sets out recommended steps to take at various stages of a PFI/PPP procurement, including involvement of external auditors, in order to ensure no late "surprises" in the proposed accounting treatment of PFI/PPP projects.

15. Normally, with appropriate transfer of risk to the private sector, a PFI/PPP project would be expected to fall "off balance sheet". In such cases, the unitary charge, which is paid to the private sector provider annually, will fall as a revenue charge in each year of the PFI/PPP contract. Thus apart from set-up costs (which would normally be accounted for as incurred) the project payments would require budgetary cover starting from the year in which it becomes operational. Disclosure would also be required of future commitments under the PFI/PPP contract. Where a property is judged to be "on balance sheet" (ie an asset of the purchaser) the fair value of the property should be recorded in the balance sheet when the asset comes into use and depreciated over its useful economic life. A liability to pay for it would also be recognised and reduced as payments for the property are made. The balance of the payments (the service element) should be recorded as an operating cost. Budgetary cover would be required for the capital and operating elements.

16. The external auditors should be consulted prior to issue of the Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) and during contract negotiations as appropriate. Guidance on the extent of consultation is set out in paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2 of "How to Account for PFI Transactions".

17. A preliminary opinion from an auditor before or during the course of the procurement would probably be suitably caveated e.g. stating that it was subject to any alteration or discovery of fact or circumstances of the transaction as it is negotiated through to completion, or in subsequent audit of financial statements. Giving such advice should not compromise the auditor's final audit opinion, as the auditor would be expected to reach the same conclusion with the same set of facts and circumstances. It is for the client organisation to judge if there is a material change of fact or circumstances sufficient to seek an update of advice already received.


Further Advice

18. Advice on the suitability of projects for the PFI/PPP approach and on the procedures to be followed should be sought from the FPU. The FPU can supply a range of detailed guidance documents. Those managing projects may also wish to draw on advice from the Scottish Procurement Directorate, Trunk Road Design and Construction Division, the Health Department's Private Finance and Capital Unit, Property Advice Division, Planning Division, Construction Advice and Policy Division, Analytical Services Division and legal and accountancy specialists.

Back to top

Page Published/ Updated: June 2005

Page updated: Thursday, June 23, 2005