On this page:

Access to Bank Finance for Scottish SMEs

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

CHAPTER FOUR: THE BUSINESS CASE

Introduction

4.1 This chapter takes a selective case study approach to examining whether there are possible examples of market failure on the part of bank lenders. Unsurprisingly, most firms were not prepared to provide the researchers with the business plans and financial information that formed part of the business case presented to bank lenders. However, after persistent requests, financial details were obtained from the seven case studies which were selected for testing scenarios of potential bank market failure with the bank lending officers in the supply-side part of the research (see chapter 5).

4.2 This part of the analysis focuses mainly on the examples of the 17 firms which were unsuccessful in their applications for bank finance and which were unable to secure sufficient finance to undertake their projects, either in part or at all (in the other three cases where no bank finance was secured the projects were still able to go ahead in full). Consideration is also given to cases where the bank funding process caused excessive delays, to the extent where it impacted on the business project in question. It is also worth noting that in the small number of cases where bank finance was not accessed, but the project was able to go ahead in its entirety, this was due to the ability of the owner/managers to raise finance from family and friends and personal loans and, therefore, may also provide evidence of market failure, to some degree.

Table 4.1 Finance Accessed by Broad Business Characteristics

Degree of Bank Finance Accessed

No Bank Finance

Some Bank Finance

All Bank Finance

Median of :

Total Funds Required

£50,000

£380,000

£225,000

External Funds Required

£50,000

£155,000

£225,000

Median of :

Total Funds Secured

£45,000 (n=8)

£152,500 (n=2)

£225,000 (n=16)

Total Bank Funds

-

£15,000

£225,000

Existing Debt

£0

£7,500

£0

Profitability:

Profit

14

1

15

Breakeven

2

0

1

Loss

4

1

1

Median of:

Firm Age (years)

14

11

10

Employment size

13

16

10

Sector:

Primary/Manufacturing

13

2

4

Retail/Wholesale

2

0

5

Hospitality

3

0

5

Professional Services

2

0

3

Location:

Highlands & Central

7

0

7

Lowlands & Borders

7

1

5

Glasgow & Edinburgh

6

1

5

Total

20

2

17

4.3 Table 4.1 demonstrates that in most respects, there is little difference between the broad characteristics of surveyed firms requiring bank finance that were able to successfully access bank finance (albeit with some degree of difficulty) and those that were partially or completely unsuccessful in accessing bank finance. A couple of notable exceptions are the high ratio of primary sector and particularly manufacturing firms that were unsuccessful in their applications for bank funding and the higher proportion of unsuccessful firms which were operating at a loss at the time of their bank application. It is also noticeable that the least successful applications were typically for a much smaller amount of funding than those that were successful.

4.4 With the possible exception of a potential bias against the manufacturing sector, these findings suggest that a more crucial factor in the bank's decision making process is likely to have been the quality and content of the project proposal. This is further explored by considering in-depth the types of projects proposed.

Table 4.2 Types of Project Proposals by Access to Bank Finance

Degree of Bank Finance Required: Accessed

Total

No Bank Finance

Some Bank Finance

All Bank Finance

No.

%

New Product

5

0

3

8

21

New Market

6

1

1

8

21

Capital Investment

8

1

9

18

46

Working Capital

8

1

1

10

26

New Start-Up

2

0

2

4

10

Buy-Out

1

0

6

7

18

Acquisition

1

0

2

3

8

R&D

1

0

0

1

3

Total

20

2

17

39

100

Notes to table
Respondents could answer more than one category

Capital Investment

4.5 Table 4.2 demonstrates that the most frequently mentioned type of project (46 per cent of the cases) related to capital investment, in order to purchase new machinery and equipment. This ranged from a multi million pound scheme to purchase an ice breaking ship that could provide full servicing to the off-shore oil and gas industry to the purchase through leasing arrangements of vans for small-scale service suppliers. These large-scale capital projects were amongst the most expensive in the survey and included most of the cases where access to bank finance took longest to resolve. In several cases where bank funding was not used for this type of project, leasing arrangements provided satisfactory (albeit more expensive) alternatives, which were generally easier and quicker to arrange. As shown in Table 24, half of the firms requiring finance for capital investment projects eventually achieved all the finance they were seeking from the banks, despite encountering other problems such as the length of time the bank took to make the decision.

4.6 A number of the capital projects involved premises work, which proved to be particularly problematic because of increasing land and construction costs, the large sums of finance required (when compared to the value of the business) and the long lead times in developing such projects. One interesting case is that of a long established chip shop where funding was required to expand the shop and purchase additional equipment. After lengthy delays, bank finance was refused and alternative, more expensive, finance was sourced, costing the business time and money.

Capital Investment Case Example 1

A chip shop, established for 40 years in an urban location, with 6 staff, seeking to expand their current premises and purchase additional equipment in order to increase output to meet a growing market demand.

The business had banked with their current bank for 10 years and had no outstanding debts, other than a standard small overdraft facility which had been managed conservatively, without problems. The bank was approached for a loan of £70,000 and requested a full financial review of the business which cost £2,000 in accountant's fees. Initially, there was a strong indication from the bank that they would provide a sufficient loan facility, but eventually, after requiring security based upon the business premises valued at over £200,000, the bank refused the loan.

"Our hopes were raised and we had to spend a considerable amount of money on accountants fees to meet the bank's demands, but eventually the bank just wasted our time and money and said that we had insufficient security …. this was odd, because our accountant thought it was fine!"

Finally, the owner/manager took out a loan with a telephone bank, at very high interest, but it was the only way to move forward, given the amount of time wasted by their existing business bank. After a delay of almost two years, the business has recently opened its expanded premises and is already increasing sales and profitability.

4.7 Another interesting case relating to capital investment is presented below. Whilst this firm did eventually receive a bank loan, delays in the bank lending process were costly to the firm and potentially damaging to the business development opportunity for this manufacturing firm.

Capital Investment Case Example 2

Glasgow based heating engineering firm, trading for 22 years, with 14 staff, seeking to grow and develop market opportunities by opening a second office in Edinburgh. The business had an overdraft facility of £10,000 to assist with cash-flow issues and was trading in profit at the time of the bank application.

The overall cost of the office purchase project was £110,000. An application was made to the firm's business bank for a loan of £50,000. The firm had also successfully obtained £30,000 from the West of Scotland Loan Fund, with assistance from Business Gateway/Scottish Enterprise. The owner/manager felt that the business proposal was strong and that his presentation to the bank went well. They had undertaken a considerable amount of market research through trade shows and trade journal research to demonstrate market feasibility for the project. However, the bank delayed giving a response to the loan application and "…did not provide an adequate explanation for the delays. The bank kept making little objections and niggling requirements, which took time to address….they were slow to respond and it became a marathon … I eventually wore them down!" The delays may have been due in part to the relatively short two year period that the firm had been with the bank and their "…uneven trading record."

After more than five months of negotiating with the bank the £50,000 loan was approved and the project went ahead in its entirety. With the opening of the new office, the business is experiencing more than the 10% increase in sales and profitability that they had forecast, with forecast sales for 2007 expected at £3.1m, compared with £2.5m in 2006. The delay in accessing the bank finance set the business back by several months, potentially costing the business £50,000 per month in lost trade.

Working Capital

4.8 Working capital was the second most frequently mentioned type of project (26 per cent of the cases) and typically related to requirements for overdraft facilities and short-term loans in order to cover cash-flow shortages, during the early stages of business start-up, for stock purchase, to bridge periods waiting for slow payment by creditors, or in a period where the business had met an unforeseen problem. Only one of the ten firms seeking working capital finance achieved all the funding they were seeking from the bank whilst another received some bank finance; the other eight firms were all unsuccessful (Table 4.2).

4.9 Several owner/managers commented on difficulties that they had experienced in obtaining overdrafts for their businesses during the early stages of trading. One partner in a newly established grocery store complained bitterly about their bank not providing them with a £2,000 overdraft facility from the start of trading. They thought that this had been promised and were shocked when they were forced to draw on their personal savings resources in order to overcome initial short-falls in cash-flow in order to purchase essential materials and stock for the business: "it is not as if the bank was not aware of our overdraft requirements - they had seen what was required when they looked at our cash-flow projections!"

4.10 A particularly interesting case, presented below, is that of an established carpentry business, where the owner/manager was injured and was unable to continue working at full capacity for several months. Although the business had a good track record and outstanding debts which had been successfully managed within an existing agreed overdraft facility, the bank refused to provide any extra finance to cover the period of sales turnover shortfall. As a result the owner had to take out a series of expensive personal loans and used alternative loan finance, which spiralled out of control, turning an initial requirement of £30,000 into outstanding debts of £50,000 over a period of 18 months. Eventually, after a visit to the Citizens Advice Bureau, it was arranged to consolidate these business related debts by remortgaging the owner's home. Subsequently, the owner/manager has fully recovered and the business is now trading successfully with increasing sales turnover and profitability.

Working Capital Case Example

A joinery business, established for 15 years, with 3 employees. The business has a regular annual sales turnover in excess of £250,000 and has successfully managed an overdraft facility of £15,000 for several years in order to overcome cash-flow issues relating to the 60 day creditor payment regime in the construction industry and the need to purchase materials, equipment and pay staff wages. Around 40 per cent of current sales turnover is generated through subcontracting work for one established large construction firm client.

Additional working capital was required in order to keep the business running during a period of almost year, after the owner/manager had suffered a broken wrist which took a long time to heal fully. The business continued to operate, in order to meet a heavy workload of existing orders, but required additional staffing during the times that the owner was unable to work. Unfortunately, the business did not have any key worker insurance cover and therefore alternative sources of funding were required.

The business's bank, which it had banked with for 12 years, was approached for a loan of £30,000. The bank refused to provide any additional funds to the business, over and above the existing overdraft facility, did not offer to meet the owner/manager and did not offer any financial advice.

The owner/manager did not seek alternative high street bank finance and instead, without consulting external advice, sought to use personal finance solutions. This resulted in "…spiralling credit card debt and the use of alternative loan shark finance. It was only after a visit to the citizens advice people, that I realised that the only option was to consolidate my debts through remortgaging …. by this stage I needed £50,000."

The owner/manager is now fully recovered and the business is operating at increased levels of sales turnover and profitability.

New Products and Markets

4.11 One fifth of surveyed firms were seeking bank finance to assist them with developing new products and a similar proportion with regard to new markets. This mainly applied to the surveyed manufacturing firms, where a number of owner/manager respondents referred to their objective to diversify business activities into more profitable areas of work. It is notable that a high proportion of these applications, specifically relating to developing new markets, were turned down by the banks, with three-quarters receiving no bank finance and one other firm only receiving partial finance (Table 4.2). In part, this poor success rate may be due to the nature of new market development, which can have a long developmental lead time. Indeed, a small number of these cases are still pursuing finance for projects where they first contacted the banks around two years ago. However, there is also an indication that the manufacturing sector is finding it difficult to raise bank finance for this kind of project.

4.12 An example of the problems in accessing bank finance for new product and market development is detailed in the case below, where a well established engineering business was seeking to obtain up to £500,000 by a combination of bank and venture capital finance. The two main partners, one of whom was an ex-banker, found themselves in a "…catch 22 situation…" with the banks being " risk averse", whilst the "… venture capitalists were not interested in such a small-scale project."

New Markets and Products Case Example

A precision engineering business, established 25 years, with 49 staff operating profitably with an annual sales turnover of £4 million, seeking to realign its marketing strategy in order to move from an existing highly competitive international trading market to a global niche market.

Considerable trade research, including attending global trade shows and exhibitions led this firm to develop a new product with new global market applications for the commercial logistics industry, notably with regard to transporting LPG.

Despite already having a considerable overdraft, the firm applied to their bank for up to £500,000 in order to facilitate product and market development. Scottish Enterprise was also approached with a view to securing venture capital finance. The business was unable to secure any external finance, despite producing a detailed business proposition and full financial details (including full profit and loss and cash-flow forecasts), due to lack of collateral.

"We were informed that there is an equity investment gap affecting businesses seeking up to £1 million and we received no interest from venture capitalists and business angels …. The bank was risk averse and wasn't interested, so we are faced with exploring options to raise the finance internally, perhaps by selling off part of our existing business."

Thus far the project has not taken place and, 18 months on from their initial approach to their bank, the business is still looking for external funding opportunities. If successfully adopted, the proposed new product and market development would "… represent a step change for the business, raising sales and profits considerably."

Buy-Out

4.13 Only one surveyed example of a buy-out firm failed to receive bank funding and this is an interesting case, which highlights the dual problems in accessing bank finance for those working in lesser known sectors and coming from a public sector/non-commercial background. The details of this case are presented below. For the remaining six businesses seeking bank finance for buy-outs, the full amount of required bank finance was secured, but problems with delays in accessing finance were encountered. Some of these delays may have been due, in part, to the changing structure and status of the buy-out businesses, which may have led them to be perceived as start-ups.

Buy-Out Case Example

A conservation studio, specialising in conserving and restoring museum artefacts - formerly operating for 20 years as a public sector organisation, with four staff. The business had an existing client base of Scottish museums and art galleries, with a full order book of work for the next 12 months.

Three partners, who were made redundant from the original business, paid £12,000 of their redundancy payments to buy-out the existing conservation business, but required a further £8,000 in order to purchase new equipment and to secure cash-flow during the early stages of running the business. A £5,000 grant was secured from Historic Scotland, which assisted with 50% of the cost of new equipment purchases, but the business's existing bank delayed for several months to offer a £3,000 overdraft facility. Eventually, when funding was made available, "…it was at a ridiculous cost … they did not provide a reasonable explanation for the delay, or for ignoring our repeated requests for overdraft assistance. I believe that they saw us as a new business - having come from a public sector background - and they didn't understand our sector. This probably contributed to the delays and the unreasonably high interest charged on the overdraft. It was too expensive for us and we decided to use our own money instead."

The business has subsequently changed banks and has been established for a couple of years. After a slow start, the business was profitable and generated £120,000 in sales turnover in the last financial year and is on course to increase sales by 50% this year.

Start-Ups

4.14 The four surveyed businesses which referred to approaching banks for finance during their start-up phase experienced mixed fortunes in their efforts to secure bank finance, with two businesses failing to obtain any bank finance. These start-up businesses were involved in a variety of sectors, but the two businesses failing to secure bank finance were both from the hospitality sector. The two cases below are indicative of the problems facing business start-ups seeking to raise bank finance.

Start-Up Case Example 1

A café and mobile food service business, selling hot and cold snacks, employing seven staff. The owner and his wife had been working abroad for several years prior to starting the business and were not considered by the bank as resident, for commercial lending purposes. Business Gateway was approached for help, but other than providing grant assistance to employ staff (who had been long-term unemployed), there was no financial assistance available to them.

The business was initially funded using £40,000 of the owner/managers' savings. A commercial business account was opened, but no overdraft facility was provided and the business suffered considerably from cash-flow problems. Funding was also required to enable the purchase of three vans for the mobile catering business and, after the bank refused to offer a loan, the vehicles were secured through leasing arrangements.

"The banks regarded us as too risky … we had been out of the country for a while and the business is cash based, with a lot of the money not passing through the bank at all! They wanted to go through our accounts in detail, but this wasn't practical. We managed to open up a commercial account with our personal bank, but they would not offer us an overdraft and, despite being mainly cash based, it was difficult to control cash-flow when some invoices were taking more than 60 days to clear …. We rejected factoring as this was too expensive."

The business is now three years old and generating sales turnover of £250,000 per annum. Whilst the business has only managed to breakeven thus far, the respondent owner/manager believed that they would make a profit in the next financial year.

Start-up Case Example 2

Two recent graduates, each aged 23, had the opportunity to buy an existing bar and restaurant busines in Edinburgh as the existing owners were planning to emigrate. The young entrepreneurs sought a £100,000 bank loan to purchase the business which they regarded as a very good opportunity having decided that they wanted to run this type of venture. They had a plan for taking over an existing well run business and building on its existing customer base. Their focus was on its timing, with the smoking ban and the ability to make use of the outdoor space that this business had. The entrepreneurs received help from their parents, who had business experience, in putting together a business plan and preparing cash-flow projections.

Several banks were approached but although they were initially encouraging, they all turned the application down for similar reasons. Whilst the business plan was accepted, the owners were seen as lacking previous management experience and lacked a business banking track record. They also did not have any collateral and were only able to put £10,000 into the business themselves. In the words of one of the founders "the banks promised a lot but in the end delivered nothing". Eventually the money to purchase the business was raised by means of their parents re-mortgaging their houses.

Acquisition

4.15 The three businesses seeking bank finance for business acquisition purposes were all from the manufacturing sector, operating in long established markets facing strong and increasing levels of competition. These businesses were seeking to grow and develop by establishing a foothold in new product and geographical markets through the purchase of existing businesses. Whilst acquisition had been a long-term strategic plan in some of these cases, when the opportunity arises for a takeover it can require a fast response and these owner/managers complained about how slow their banks were in responding to their loan requests. One respondent referred to a delay on the part of the bank of two months, when matters were referred to a centralised team in Edinburgh, which "…nearly killed the deal." Interestingly, this case was the only one, amongst the surveyed firms, where the Small Firms Loan Guarantee Scheme was specifically mentioned, perhaps indicating that this form of bank finance is rarely utilised.

4.16 The case where an acquisition failed to take place because of the late withdrawal of bank lending support, outlines the extent of the problems encountered, when bank funding is required within relatively tight time deadlines.

Acquisition Case Example

A manufacturing firm specialising in making windows for commercial vehicles ( e.g. buses and trains), established for 10 years, with a workforce of 80 staff based on three sites. The firm has been experiencing increasing foreign competition in its main markets and has been seeking an opportunity to diversify into the more lucrative, higher value added, and less competitive commercial vehicle door manufacturing market.

An opportunity arose to acquire a UK based commercial door manufacturing firm, which had gone into receivership. Full due diligence was undertaken by a specialist consultancy firm, at considerable expense and the firm approached their bank with a detailed set of financials (including 3 year projections, full accounts and a detailed business plan), with a view to raising £1 million in bank and equity finance out of a total project cost of £2.2 million. "Initially, at the local branch, our bank was interested in lending us the full £1 million and venture capital options were not followed up. However, our loan request was referred centrally to Edinburgh and then delays started to take place. Eventually, the bank refused our loan application with two days remaining before the deal had to take place - effectively leaving us with no options but to withdraw." The only reason provided for refusing the loan was that the business was reliant upon three main clients "…but they were aware of this from the start."

Subsequently, the business has changed banks. One of the directors, an ex-banker, was "… disgusted with the actions of the bank … and embarrassed to have once worked for them." Using internal business funding, they have started up their own commercial door manufacturing division and, although on a small scale, after only a year it is contributing one tenth of the annual £4 million sales turnover with the division's sales forecast to rise four-fold during the next two years.

4.17 To summarise, therefore, the more qualitative analysis of the 39 surveyed firms that reported difficulties in applying for bank finance and particularly the 17 of them that did not obtain any bank finance shows that:

  • Whilst there is little difference between those firms that successfully applied for bank finance (but experienced some difficulties) and those that were unsuccessful, it is clear that a higher proportion of manufacturing firms were unsuccessful in their applications for bank finance than firms in other sectors.
  • The applications for bank finance that were unsuccessful were typically for much smaller amounts than those that were successful.
  • The most common reason for seeking bank finance was capital investment, principally for the purchase of new machinery and equipment or undertaking work on premises. Half of these applications were successful (albeit after delays etc).
  • The second most frequently mentioned reason for seeking bank finance was working capital, typically in the form of overdraft facilities and short-term loans to cover cash-flow shortages.
  • Most the firms (mainly manufacturing firms) who had problems accessing finance for new product and market development were unable to obtain any funding from the banks, indicating the particular difficulties that firms experienced in raising finance where diversification into new product/market areas and therefore a higher degree of risk was involved.

4.18 Having analysed the data relating to the experiences of SMEs in applying for bank finance, the next chapter looks at a number of selected case studies from a supply-side perspective, based on interviews with a sample of bank managers from three Scottish commercial banks.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Monday, September 8, 2008